Brian Stork

655 citations
23 papers · 451 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Social Media in Health Education 6
    • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments 2

Brian Stork

19 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Brian Stork
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Health 235
  • Reproductive Medicine 45
  • General Health Professions 127
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 14
  • Health Informatics 2
Replace Krista Lai with:
Krista Lai United States
Murat Ferhat Ferhatoğlu Türkiye
Mary Kate Keeter United States
Elaine Cham United States
Erin Medlin United States
Luiz Vinícius de Alcantara Sousa Brazil
Emily McBride United Kingdom
Soledad Márquez-Calderón Spain
Poonam Misra United States
Nazek Abdelmutti Canada
Brian Stork relative to Krista Lai United States Krista Lai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Krista Lai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Stork

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Stork's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Stork with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Stork more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Stork

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Stork. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Stork. The network helps show where Brian Stork may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Stork, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Stork Line = papers co-authored together Brian Stork links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014133
2 2013118
3 200157
4 200550
5 201919
6 202017
7 201516
8 20169
9 20088
10 20205
11 20193
12 20243
13 20213
14
The Ability of Dogs to Detect Human Prostate Cancer Before and After Radical Prostatectomy
20153
15 20192
16 20201
17 20151
18 20211
19 20211
20 20231

About Brian Stork

Brian Stork is a scholar working on Health, Surgery, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media in Health Education (6 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (1 paper) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (235 citations), Reproductive Medicine (45 citations), General Health Professions (127 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (14 citations) and Health Informatics (2 citations). Brian Stork has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ben Davies, Henry H. Woo, Michael Leveridge, Isaac Thangasamy, Antonio Finelli, Evan J. Kass, Stacy Loeb, Bruce W. Steinert, Scott E. Eggener and Matthew R. Cooperberg. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, British Journal of Urology, Urology, European Urology and JAMA Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact