Brian Greene

14 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Brian Greene
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Atmospheric Science 186
  • Environmental Engineering 117
  • Global and Planetary Change 148
  • Aerospace Engineering 117
  • Computational Mechanics 40
Replace Tyler Bell with:
Tyler Bell United States
Philip G. Gill United Kingdom
Ludovic P. Thobois France
Sabrina Martin Germany
Timothy W. Juliano United States
Brian J. Vanderwende United States
Zhigang Chu China
Peter Brugger Germany
Gregory Meymaris United States
Sean Waugh United States
Brian Greene relative to Tyler Bell United States Tyler Bell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Tyler Bell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Greene

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Greene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Greene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Greene more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Greene

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Greene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Greene. The network helps show where Brian Greene may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Greene, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Greene Line = papers co-authored together Brian Greene links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201954
2 201846
3 202045
4 201940
5 202038
6 202120
7 202214
8 20217
9 20236
10 19964
11 20222
12 20241
13 20101
14 20251
15
Responsive Acquisitions: A Case Study on Improved Workflow at a Small Academic Library
20140

About Brian Greene

Brian Greene is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (11 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (7 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (6 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (5 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (2 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper) and Big Data and Business Intelligence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (186 citations), Environmental Engineering (117 citations), Global and Planetary Change (148 citations), Aerospace Engineering (117 citations) and Computational Mechanics (40 citations). Brian Greene has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Phillip B. Chilson, Antonio R. Segales, Tyler Bell, Elizabeth Ann Pillar-Little, William Doyle, Joshua J. Martin, Sean Waugh, M. F. Carney, Petra M. Klein and Stephan T. Kral. Their work appears in journals such as Atmospheric measurement techniques, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Sensors, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences and Earth system science data.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact