Brian C. Smith

505 citations
44 papers · 334 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Brian C. Smith

36 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Brian C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Public Administration 59
  • Urban Studies 55
  • Political Science and International Relations 151
  • Finance 36
  • Development 13
Replace Dilys M. Hill with:
Dilys M. Hill United Kingdom
Gregory Albo Canada
Didier Georgakakis France
Jim Buller United Kingdom
Armando Boito Brazil
Josh Pacewicz United States
Joel Stillerman United States
Willem Trommel Netherlands
Larry C. Ledebur United States
Pete Burgess United Kingdom
Brian C. Smith relative to Dilys M. Hill United Kingdom Dilys M. Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14×
Dilys M. Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian C. Smith. The network helps show where Brian C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Brian C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Brian C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200064
2 199832
3 199732
4 199827
5 199621
6 200016
7 197914
8 202413
9 198112
10 199812
11 198111
12 19838
13 19828
14
Field administration : an aspect of decentralisation
19677
15 20236
16 20086
17 19865
18 19724
19
Judges and Democratization: Judicial Independence in New Democracies
20154
20 19963

About Brian C. Smith

Brian C. Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Law, Public Administration and Urban Studies, having authored 44 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Local Government Finance and Decentralization (8 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (4 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Political Systems and Governance (2 papers) and Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (59 citations), Urban Studies (55 citations), Political Science and International Relations (151 citations), Finance (36 citations) and Development (13 citations). Brian C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ján Buček, PAUL D. COLLINS, Allen H. Barton, Herbert Kaufman, Hal G. Rainey, Douglas C. Pitt, Donald P. Warwick, Marshall W. Meyer, Andrew Dunsire and Christopher Hood. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration and Development, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Public Administration, Public Administration Review and Policy Studies Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact