Policy Studies Journal

2.2k papers and 45.1k indexed citations

About

The 2.2k papers published in Policy Studies Journal in the last decades have received a total of 45.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Policy Studies Journal usually cover Political Science and International Relations (984 papers), Sociology and Political Science (516 papers) and Public Administration (467 papers) specifically the topics of Policy Transfer and Learning (472 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (444 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (271 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Policy Studies Journal are Элинор Остром, Michael D. Jones, Christopher M. Weible, Paul Sabatier, Mark Lubell, Michael D. McGinnis, Richard C. Feiock, Michael Mintrom, Mark K. McBeth and Dara O’Rourke.

In The Last Decade

Policy Studies Journal

1.8k papers receiving 38.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Policy Studies Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Policy Studies Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Policy Studies Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Policy Studies Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Policy Studies Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Policy Studies Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Policy Studies Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026