International Review of Administrative Sciences

32.4k citations
1.8k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

International Review of Administrative Sciences

1.2k papers receiving 26.0k citations

Peers

International Review of Administrative Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
  • Public Administration 9.4k
  • Political Science and International Relations 12.6k
  • Strategy and Management 5.4k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 3.3k
  • Management Information Systems 2.6k
Replace International Journal of Public Administration with:
International Journal of Public Administration United States
Administration & Society United States
Policy Sciences United States
The American Review of Public Administration United States
International Journal of Public Sector Management United Kingdom
Governance United States
Australian Journal of Public Administration Australia
Public Money & Management United Kingdom
Policy Studies Journal United States
Public Management Review United States
International Review of Administrative Sciences relative to International Journal of Public Administration United States International Journal of Public Administration's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
International Journal of Public Administration · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Review of Administrative Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Review of Administrative Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Review of Administrative Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Review of Administrative Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Review of Administrative Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Review of Administrative Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Review of Administrative Sciences.

About International Review of Administrative Sciences

The 1.8k papers published in International Review of Administrative Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 32.4k indexed citations . Papers published in International Review of Administrative Sciences usually cover Public Administration (522 papers), Political Science and International Relations (649 papers), Development (55 papers), Strategy and Management (221 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (132 papers) specifically the topics of Public Policy and Administration Research (500 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (178 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (110 papers), E-Government and Public Services (106 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (95 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (72 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (70 papers) and Policy Transfer and Learning (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Review of Administrative Sciences are Albert Jacob Meijer, Tony Bovaird, Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar, M. Shamsul Haque, Dennis A. Rondinelli, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Geert Bouckaert, Wouter Vandenabeele, Ank Michels and Steven Van de Walle.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact