Joel Stillerman

516 citations
19 papers · 264 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Joel Stillerman

17 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

Joel Stillerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Public Administration 59
  • Urban Studies 66
  • Sociology and Political Science 129
  • Marketing 22
  • General Health Professions 59
Replace Aram Eisenschitz with:
Aram Eisenschitz United Kingdom
Dario Azzellini United States
Devi Sacchetto Italy
Madeleine Pill United Kingdom
Nanneke Redclift United Kingdom
Anne Vogelpohl Germany
Murray Stewart United Kingdom
Emma Clarence United Kingdom
Pete Burgess United Kingdom
Bert E. Swanson United States
Joel Stillerman relative to Aram Eisenschitz United Kingdom Aram Eisenschitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Aram Eisenschitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joel Stillerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joel Stillerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joel Stillerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joel Stillerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joel Stillerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joel Stillerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joel Stillerman. The network helps show where Joel Stillerman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Joel Stillerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joel Stillerman Line = papers co-authored together Joel Stillerman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201662
2 201252
3 200632
4 200326
5 200419
6 200315
7 200614
8 201711
9 20039
10 20177
11 20167
12 20072
13 20042
14 20062
15
Es mucho más que comprar… Discursos y prácticas espaciales cotidianas en Malls de Santiago
20101
16 20131
17
Militant Trade Unionist or Happy Consumer? The Ambiguities of Working-class Identity in Post-Pinochet Chile
19971
18 20221
19 20210

About Joel Stillerman

Joel Stillerman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Urban Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (7 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (5 papers), Latin American Urban Studies (3 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (2 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (2 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (59 citations), Urban Studies (66 citations), Sociology and Political Science (129 citations), Marketing (22 citations) and General Health Professions (59 citations). Joel Stillerman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Rodrigo Salcedo, Chris Tilly and Peter Winn. Their work appears in journals such as International Labor and Working-Class History, Social Science History, Latin American Politics and Society, EURE (Santiago) and Qualitative Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact