Armando Boito

787 citations
54 papers · 366 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Armando Boito

35 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Armando Boito
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Public Administration 43
  • Development 35
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 73
  • Urban Studies 34
  • Sociology and Political Science 227
Replace Eli Diniz with:
Eli Diniz Brazil
Lecio Morais Portugal
Hannes Lacher Canada
Emir Sader Brazil
Kosmas Tsokhas Australia
Marta Cehelsky United States
Jorge Nef Canada
Christian Anglade United Kingdom
Kathleen Bruhn United States
Bob Sutcliffe Spain
Armando Boito relative to Eli Diniz Brazil Eli Diniz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Eli Diniz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Armando Boito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Armando Boito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Armando Boito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Armando Boito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Armando Boito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Armando Boito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Armando Boito. The network helps show where Armando Boito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Armando Boito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Armando Boito Line = papers co-authored together Armando Boito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201646
2 201446
3 201331
4 201023
5 200321
6
Brazil: The Failure of the PT and the Rise of the ‘New Right’
201618
7 202017
8 200517
9 202116
10 201113
11 200712
12 199412
13 199611
14
Politica neoliberal e sindicalismo no Brasil
19989
15
As bases políticas do neodesenvolvimentismo
20127
16 20176
17 19986
18 20015
19 20155
20 20135

About Armando Boito

Armando Boito is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Political Issues (20 papers), Social and Economic Solidarity (17 papers), Brazilian cultural history and politics (9 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (7 papers), Youth, Politics, and Society (7 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers) and Brazilian History and Foreign Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (43 citations), Development (35 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (73 citations), Urban Studies (34 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (227 citations). Armando Boito has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alfredo Saad‐Filho, Laura Randall and Carlos Nelson Coutinho. Their work appears in journals such as Latin American Perspectives, Caderno CRH, Lusotopie, Revista de Sociologia e Política and Actuel Marx.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact