Armando Boito

782 citations
50 papers · 327 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Armando Boito

33 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Armando Boito
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Public Administration 41
  • Development 30
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 68
  • Urban Studies 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 213
Replace Eli Diniz with:
Eli Diniz Brazil
Lecio Morais United Kingdom
Emir Sader Brazil
Hannes Lacher Canada
Manfred Bienefeld United Kingdom
Pete Burgess United Kingdom
Kosmas Tsokhas Australia
Alexander Anievas United Kingdom
Geoffrey Kay United Kingdom
Eduardo Dargent Peru
Armando Boito relative to Eli Diniz Brazil Eli Diniz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Eli Diniz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Armando Boito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Armando Boito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Armando Boito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Armando Boito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Armando Boito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Armando Boito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Armando Boito. The network helps show where Armando Boito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Armando Boito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Armando Boito Line = papers co-authored together Armando Boito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201640
2 201429
3 201328
4 201021
5 200319
6 202018
7 200517
8
Brazil: The Failure of the PT and the Rise of the ‘New Right’
201616
9 202115
10 200712
11 201111
12 199611
13 199410
14
Politica neoliberal e sindicalismo no Brasil
19989
15
As bases políticas do neodesenvolvimentismo
20127
16 20177
17 20015
18 20135
19 19985
20 20155

About Armando Boito

Armando Boito is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Political Issues (19 papers), Social and Economic Solidarity (16 papers), Brazilian cultural history and politics (9 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (7 papers), Youth, Politics, and Society (7 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (3 papers) and Brazilian History and Foreign Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (41 citations), Development (30 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (68 citations), Urban Studies (30 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (213 citations). Armando Boito has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Alfredo Saad‐Filho, Laura Randall and Carlos Nelson Coutinho. Their work appears in journals such as Latin American Perspectives, Caderno CRH, Cahiers des Amériques latines, Revista de Sociologia e Política and Actuel Marx.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact