Bret E. Fuller

41 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Bret E. Fuller
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Biological Psychiatry 64
  • Health 205
  • Hepatology 129
  • Applied Psychology 68
  • Epidemiology 427
Replace Lísia von Diemen with:
Lísia von Diemen Brazil
José J. López‐Goñi Spain
John Kowal Canada
Jan A. Lindsay United States
Ruimin Ma United Kingdom
Patricia Chou United States
Anette Søgaard Nielsen Denmark
Benjamín Vicente Chile
Zuzana Dankulincová Veselská Slovakia
Yonette F. Thomas United States
Bret E. Fuller relative to Lísia von Diemen Brazil Lísia von Diemen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Lísia von Diemen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bret E. Fuller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bret E. Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bret E. Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bret E. Fuller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bret E. Fuller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bret E. Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bret E. Fuller. The network helps show where Bret E. Fuller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bret E. Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bret E. Fuller Line = papers co-authored together Bret E. Fuller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000136
2 2007111
3 2001106
4 2006102
5 200667
6 201761
7 200060
8 200353
9 200553
10 199951
11 201149
12 200945
13 201543
14 201143
15 200742
16 201438
17 201436
18 200736
19 201335
20 199935

About Bret E. Fuller

Bret E. Fuller is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Social Psychology, Hepatology, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (7 papers), Hepatitis C virus research (6 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (3 papers) and Career Development and Diversity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (64 citations), Health (205 citations), Hepatology (129 citations), Applied Psychology (68 citations) and Epidemiology (427 citations). Bret E. Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Stephen T. Chermack, Frederic C. Blow, Dennis McCarty, Traci Rieckmann, Péter Hauser, Maureen A. Walton, Jennifer M. Loftis, Marilyn Huckans, Edward V. Nunes and Cynthia L. Arfken. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Career Assessment and Psychiatric Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact