Reesa Laws

26 papers receiving 797 citations

Peers

Reesa Laws
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Family Practice 50
  • Health Information Management 163
  • Periodontics 73
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 109
  • Health Informatics 15
Replace Chuhe Chen with:
Chuhe Chen United States
Oluwabunmi A. Tokede United States
Sanjeev N. Mehta United States
Jocelyn R. Wilder United States
Navin Kumar Devaraj Malaysia
Arsalan Salari Iran
Jane Taggart Australia
Sujay S Kakarmath United States
Alfa Yansane United States
Stéphane Besançon United States
Reesa Laws relative to Chuhe Chen United States Chuhe Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Chuhe Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reesa Laws

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reesa Laws's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reesa Laws with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reesa Laws more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reesa Laws

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reesa Laws. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reesa Laws. The network helps show where Reesa Laws may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Reesa Laws, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reesa Laws Line = papers co-authored together Reesa Laws links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013174
2 1999167
3 200784
4 199964
5 201461
6
Improving adherence to cardiovascular disease medications with information technology.
201457
7 201343
8 201735
9 201128
10 201419
11 201617
12 201012
13 201912
14 201711
15 20038
16 20107
17 20166
18 20164
19 20133
20 20153

About Reesa Laws

Reesa Laws is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Family Practice, Periodontics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 825 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (5 papers), Dental Health and Care Utilization (5 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper) and Data Quality and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (50 citations), Health Information Management (163 citations), Periodontics (73 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (109 citations) and Health Informatics (15 citations). Reesa Laws has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William M. Vollmer, Alan E. Bauck, NJERI M KARANJA, Pao‐Hwa Lin, Eva Obarzanek, MARLENE M WINDHAUSER, W. Ed Hammond, Rachel Richesson, Gregory E. Simon and Michelle Smerek. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Clinical Medicine & Research, Journal of Dental Research, Journal of the American Heart Association and Evaluation & the Health Professions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact