Thomas Grundmann

868 citations
53 papers · 305 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Grundmann

41 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Thomas Grundmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Philosophy 229
  • History and Philosophy of Science 41
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 100
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 102
  • Family Practice 7
Replace Trent Dougherty with:
Trent Dougherty United States
Adam Leite United States
Aaron Z. Zimmerman United States
Neil Sinhababu Singapore
Marc A. Moffett United States
Tomás Bogardus United States
Jennifer Nado Hong Kong
Chris Ranalli Netherlands
Joachim Horvath Germany
Aidan McGlynn United Kingdom
Thomas Grundmann relative to Trent Dougherty United States Trent Dougherty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Trent Dougherty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Grundmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Grundmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Grundmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Grundmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Grundmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Grundmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Grundmann. The network helps show where Thomas Grundmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Grundmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Grundmann Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Grundmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201842
2 201033
3 201829
4 200917
5 200815
6 201315
7 200713
8 202013
9 200311
10 202110
11 201710
12 20219
13 20038
14 20218
15 20197
16
Analytische Transzendentalphilosophie : eine Kritik
19947
17
Die experimentelle Philosophie in der Diskussion
20146
18 20176
19 20194
20 20144

About Thomas Grundmann

Thomas Grundmann is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (27 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (19 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (9 papers), Free Will and Agency (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers) and Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (229 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (41 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (100 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (102 citations) and Family Practice (7 citations). Thomas Grundmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Joachim Horvath, Sven Bernecker, Catrin Misselhorn, Jens Kipper, Philipp Reclam jun. GmbH & Co. KG, Anton Friedrich Koch, Markus Gabriel and Ursula Utz. Their work appears in journals such as Grazer Philosophische Studien, Erkenntnis, Synthese, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Social Epistemology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact