Simon Goldstein
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 20
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 19
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 13
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 5
- Logic, programming, and type systems 3
- Co-authors
- Bob Beddor (3 shared papers)Peter S. Park (1 shared paper)Michael Chen (1 shared paper)Dan Hendrycks (1 shared paper)John Hawthorne (4 shared papers)Fabrizio Cariani (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (4 papers)Mind (4 papers)The Journal of Philosophy (3 papers)AI & Society (2 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Simon Goldstein
28 papers receiving 221 citations
Simon Goldstein's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Philosophy 120
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 96
- Health Informatics 6
- Safety Research 34
- General Decision Sciences 7
Countries citing papers authored by Simon Goldstein
This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Goldstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Goldstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Goldstein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Goldstein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Goldstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Goldstein. The network helps show where Simon Goldstein may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Simon Goldstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI deception: A survey of examples, risks, and potential solutions Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 74 |
| 2 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 5 | A preface paradox for intention | 2016 | 16 |
| 6 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 2 |
About Simon Goldstein
Simon Goldstein is a scholar working on Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety Research, having authored 31 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (13 papers), Free Will and Agency (7 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (120 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (96 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations), Safety Research (34 citations) and General Decision Sciences (7 citations). Simon Goldstein has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bob Beddor, Peter S. Park, Michael Chen, Dan Hendrycks, John Hawthorne and Fabrizio Cariani. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Mind, The Journal of Philosophy, AI & Society and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.