Bo Mou

422 citations
43 papers · 178 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought

Papers in

Bo Mou

33 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers

Bo Mou
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Religious studies 41
  • Philosophy 54
  • Sociology and Political Science 83
  • History and Philosophy of Science 8
  • Cultural Studies 14
Replace Chris Fraser with:
Chris Fraser Hong Kong
Victoria S. Harrison United Kingdom
Thomas F. Cleary
Mark Wynn United Kingdom
Purushottama Bilimoria Australia
K. N. Jayatilleke
Eric L. Hutton United States
William Desmond Belgium
Jane Geaney United States
John A. Taber United States
Bo Mou relative to Chris Fraser Hong Kong Chris Fraser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chris Fraser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bo Mou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bo Mou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bo Mou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bo Mou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bo Mou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bo Mou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bo Mou. The network helps show where Bo Mou may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
History of Chinese Philosophy
200841
2
Two Roads to Wisdom? –--Chinese and Analytic Philosophical Traditions
200120
3
On Constructive-Engagement Strategy in Comparative Philosophy
200811
4 199911
5 20048
6 20108
7 20096
8
On Some Methodological Issues Concerning Chinese Philosophy
20096
9
Davidson’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy: Constructive Engagement
20065
10 20015
11
Cross-Tradition Engagement in Philosophy : A Constructive-Engagement Account
20205
12
An Analysis of the Structure of Philosophical Methodology: In View of Comparative Philosophy,
20015
13
Searle's philosophy and Chinese philosophy : constructive engagement
20084
14 20004
15 20073
16 20203
17
Becoming-Being Complementarity: An Account of the Yin-Yang Metaphysical Vision of the Yi-Jing
20033
18 20093
19 20222
20 20172

About Bo Mou

Bo Mou is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Religious studies, having authored 43 papers that have together received 178 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (11 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (41 citations), Philosophy (54 citations), Sociology and Political Science (83 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations) and Cultural Studies (14 citations). Bo Mou has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, History and Philosophy of Logic, Asian Studies, Philosophical Papers and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact