Bo Mou

422 citations
60 papers · 256 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy

Papers in

Bo Mou

41 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers

Bo Mou
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Religious studies 48
  • Philosophy 94
  • History and Philosophy of Science 27
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
  • Sociology and Political Science 125
Replace Bryan van Norden with:
Bryan van Norden United States
Chris Fraser Hong Kong
John C. Maraldo United States
Emil Angehrn Switzerland
Steve Odin United States
Keiji Nishitani Japan
John A. Taber United States
Victoria S. Harrison United Kingdom
Reiner Schürmann United States
Hermann Cohen Switzerland
Bo Mou relative to Bryan van Norden United States Bryan van Norden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Bryan van Norden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bo Mou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bo Mou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bo Mou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bo Mou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bo Mou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bo Mou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bo Mou. The network helps show where Bo Mou may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
History of Chinese Philosophy
200878
2
Two Roads to Wisdom? –--Chinese and Analytic Philosophical Traditions
200126
3 199914
4
On Constructive-Engagement Strategy in Comparative Philosophy
200811
5 20049
6 20108
7 20097
8
Davidson’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy: Constructive Engagement
20066
9 20016
10
On Some Methodological Issues Concerning Chinese Philosophy
20096
11
Cross-Tradition Engagement in Philosophy : A Constructive-Engagement Account
20206
12 20075
13 20095
14 20005
15
An Analysis of the Structure of Philosophical Methodology: In View of Comparative Philosophy,
20015
16
Searle's philosophy and Chinese philosophy : constructive engagement
20084
17 20064
18 20203
19
Becoming-Being Complementarity: An Account of the Yin-Yang Metaphysical Vision of the Yi-Jing
20033
20 20073

About Bo Mou

Bo Mou is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Religious studies, having authored 60 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (16 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (48 citations), Philosophy (94 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (27 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (50 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (125 citations). Bo Mou has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Their work appears in journals such as History and Philosophy of Logic, Philosophy East and West, Synthese, Philosophical Papers and Metaphilosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact