Bette Loef

32 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers

Bette Loef
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 248
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 123
  • General Health Professions 177
  • Physiology 130
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 63
Replace Jenny-Anne Lie with:
Jenny-Anne Lie Norway
Suzanne L. Merkus Norway
Kati Karhula Finland
A. van Drongelen Netherlands
Arezu Najafi Iran
Minoru Hojou Japan
YU Kai-feng China
C.R.L. Boot Netherlands
Emily W. Flanagan United States
Bo‐Huei Huang Australia
Bette Loef relative to Jenny-Anne Lie Norway Jenny-Anne Lie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Jenny-Anne Lie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bette Loef

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bette Loef's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bette Loef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bette Loef more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bette Loef

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bette Loef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bette Loef. The network helps show where Bette Loef may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bette Loef, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bette Loef Line = papers co-authored together Bette Loef links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201869
2 201951
3 201851
4 201834
5 202133
6 202132
7 202230
8 201928
9 202224
10 202222
11 201620
12 201618
13 202216
14 202413
15 202013
16 201512
17 201911
18 20227
19 20226
20 20236

About Bette Loef

Bette Loef is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 36 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (16 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (10 papers), Sleep and related disorders (9 papers), Physical Activity and Health (7 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (5 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (4 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (4 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (248 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (123 citations), General Health Professions (177 citations), Physiology (130 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (63 citations). Bette Loef has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Ireland and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Karin I. Proper, Allard J. van der Beek, Debbie van Baarle, Gerben Hulsegge, Till Roenneberg, Sandra H. van Oostrom, Patricia Bruijning‐Verhagen, Elisabeth A. M. Sanders, Albert Wong and Maaike van der Noordt. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, BMC Public Health, Scientific Reports and Chronobiology International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact