Janene Batten

34 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers

Janene Batten
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Pharmacy 34
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 156
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 42
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 71
  • General Health Professions 72
Replace Emily Little with:
Emily Little United States
Yu-Yun Alice Hsu Taiwan
Gail R. Janes United States
Skye McPhie Australia
Melanie Harris Australia
Shervin S. Churchill United States
Karin A. Wittkampf Netherlands
Rosemary Helen Gibson New Zealand
Jennifer Salerno Canada
Deborah Wince Chapa United States
Janene Batten relative to Emily Little United States Emily Little's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
Emily Little · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janene Batten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janene Batten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janene Batten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janene Batten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janene Batten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janene Batten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janene Batten. The network helps show where Janene Batten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janene Batten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janene Batten Line = papers co-authored together Janene Batten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019118
2 202349
3 202048
4 202044
5 202130
6 202126
7 201925
8 201019
9 202119
10 202218
11 201811
12 202011
13 202210
14 20199
15 20219
16 20219
17 20229
18 20249
19 20208
20 20217

About Janene Batten

Janene Batten is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 40 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Nursing care and research (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (3 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers) and Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (34 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (156 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (42 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (71 citations) and General Health Professions (72 citations). Janene Batten has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and China. Frequent co-authors include Samantha Conley, Alexandria L. Brackett, Nancy Schmieder Redeker, Garrett I. Ash, Brienne Miner, Andrea K. Knies, Sangchoon Jeon, Samuel Akyirem, Stephanie Alisha Griggs and Margaret J. Grey. Their work appears in journals such as Heart & Lung, Sleep Medicine Reviews, Nursing Outlook, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice and Lung Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact