Janene Batten

31 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers

Janene Batten
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 113
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 30
  • General Health Professions 70
  • Pharmacy 12
Replace Bradley Beuschel with:
Bradley Beuschel United States
Annette Nygårdh Sweden
Łukasz Cybulski Poland
Khaled Suleiman Jordan
Bert Park United Kingdom
Michelle Tubman Canada
Umberto Granziol Italy
Michelle Darezzo Rodrigues Nunes Brazil
Diana Sarokhani Iran
Sandra Adams Motzer United States
Janene Batten relative to Bradley Beuschel United States Bradley Beuschel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Bradley Beuschel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janene Batten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janene Batten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janene Batten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janene Batten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janene Batten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janene Batten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janene Batten. The network helps show where Janene Batten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janene Batten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janene Batten Line = papers co-authored together Janene Batten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019107
2 202042
3 202041
4 202334
5 202125
6 201924
7 202124
8 201019
9 202218
10 202111
11 202010
12 201810
13 20219
14 20219
15 20208
16 20197
17 20217
18 20237
19 20226
20 20206

About Janene Batten

Janene Batten is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (7 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (113 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (30 citations), General Health Professions (70 citations) and Pharmacy (12 citations). Janene Batten has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Samantha Conley, Alexandria Brackett, Nancy S. Redeker, Garrett I. Ash, Sangchoon Jeon, Andrea Knies, Brienne Miner, Stephanie Griggs, Margaret Grey and Abigail Wilpers. Their work appears in journals such as Heart & Lung, Sleep Medicine Reviews, Nursing Outlook, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact