Beth Rush

1.6k citations
21 papers · 572 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Beth Rush

17 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Beth Rush
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 248
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 17
  • General Decision Sciences 15
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 97
Replace Sylvie Daigneault with:
Sylvie Daigneault Canada
Raksha A. Mudar United States
Kari Hawkins United Kingdom
Daniel Sacchetti United States
Doreen M. Baxter United Kingdom
Caroline de Oliveira Cardoso Brazil
Michael W. Montgomery United States
Severine Dehaene France
Joshua Sandry United States
Shana A. Hall United States
Beth Rush relative to Sylvie Daigneault Canada Sylvie Daigneault's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Sylvie Daigneault · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Rush. The network helps show where Beth Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Rush Line = papers co-authored together Beth Rush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005159
2 2006115
3 200783
4 201138
5 200638
6 202131
7 200424
8 201723
9 202319
10 201018
11 201610
12 20104
13 20233
14 20203
15 20102
16 20231
17 20241
18 20250
19 20160
20 20240

About Beth Rush

Beth Rush is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (2 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (2 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (248 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (17 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (97 citations). Beth Rush has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Todd S. Braver, Deanna M. Barch, Anne M. Moessner, Allen W. Brown, James F. Malec, Ajay B. Satpute, Caroline A. Racine, Julie A. Testa, Susan Woolley and Bonnie C. Sachs. Their work appears in journals such as Rehabilitation Psychology, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Neurorehabilitation and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact