P.M. Dean

33 papers receiving 956 citations

Peers

P.M. Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Catalysis 487
  • Filtration and Separation 61
  • Electrochemistry 110
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 111
  • Aging 19
Replace Xin‐Xing Zhang with:
Xin‐Xing Zhang China
Francesca Mocci Italy
Matthias Nüchter Germany
Andreas Kruse Denmark
Hiroshi Hamano Japan
Kristin A. Fletcher United States
Joseph A. Levisky United States
Piotr Cysewski Poland
Jan Storch Czechia
Krisztina Sebök‐Nagy Hungary
P.M. Dean relative to Xin‐Xing Zhang China Xin‐Xing Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Xin‐Xing Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P.M. Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P.M. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.M. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.M. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P.M. Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.M. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.M. Dean. The network helps show where P.M. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P.M. Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P.M. Dean Line = papers co-authored together P.M. Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011124
2 2010113
3 2008113
4 2011100
5 200959
6 201156
7 201953
8 201645
9 200845
10 201343
11 201237
12 200432
13 200919
14 201919
15 202016
16 201713
17 201913
18 201811
19 202010
20 200910

About P.M. Dean

P.M. Dean is a scholar working on Catalysis, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 37 papers that have together received 982 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionic liquids properties and applications (10 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Galectins and Cancer Biology (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (487 citations), Filtration and Separation (61 citations), Electrochemistry (110 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (111 citations) and Aging (19 citations). P.M. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Douglas R. MacFarlane, Jennifer M. Pringle, Ekaterina I. Izgorodina, Janet L. Scott, J. Stoimenovski, Masahiro Yoshizawa‐Fujita, Vanessa Armel, Kenneth R. Seddon, Allan H. White and Brian W. Skelton. Their work appears in journals such as The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Australian Journal of Chemistry, Crystal Growth & Design, CrystEngComm and Frontiers in Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact