Jo‐Anne Rayner

51 papers receiving 638 citations

Peers

Jo‐Anne Rayner
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 89
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 15
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 63
  • Research and Theory 7
  • Reproductive Medicine 49
Replace Lorena Binfa with:
Lorena Binfa Chile
Margaret Burnett Canada
Karen Barnard United States
Özgül Erol Türkiye
Ashraf Direkvand‐Moghadam Iran
Young Ko South Korea
Annette Haywood United Kingdom
Tara Beatty United States
Abdolghani Abdollahimohammad Iran
Ouida E Westney United States
Jo‐Anne Rayner relative to Lorena Binfa Chile Lorena Binfa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.1×
Lorena Binfa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo‐Anne Rayner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo‐Anne Rayner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo‐Anne Rayner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo‐Anne Rayner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo‐Anne Rayner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo‐Anne Rayner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo‐Anne Rayner. The network helps show where Jo‐Anne Rayner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo‐Anne Rayner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo‐Anne Rayner Line = papers co-authored together Jo‐Anne Rayner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200962
2 200857
3 200755
4 201143
5 200937
6 200636
7 202024
8 201023
9 200722
10 201821
11 201517
12 201017
13 201216
14 201215
15 201114
16 200512
17
PINC : a review of in-hospital postnatal care in Victoria
200512
18 201211
19 201111
20 202010

About Jo‐Anne Rayner

Jo‐Anne Rayner is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Complementary and alternative medicine, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 54 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (14 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (8 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (3 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (89 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (15 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (63 citations), Research and Theory (7 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (49 citations). Jo‐Anne Rayner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Della Forster, Helen McLachlan, Jane Yelland, Karen Willis, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh, Kerri Beckmann, Judith Lumley, Michael Bauer, Lyndsey F. Watson and Judith Lumley. Their work appears in journals such as Midwifery, Australasian Journal on Ageing, Health Promotion Journal of Australia, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology and Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact