Bert Tuk

22 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Bert Tuk
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 593
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 174
  • Pharmacology 140
  • Pharmaceutical Science 98
  • Computational Mathematics 5
Replace Gyu‐Jeong Noh with:
Gyu‐Jeong Noh South Korea
Helmut Schwilden Germany
Janine Oberyé Netherlands
Rǎjesh C. Sachdeo United States
Thomas Lundqvist Sweden
N. Pradhan India
Jun‐Hwan Lee South Korea
Stélio Pacca Loureiro Luna Brazil
Scott D. Greenwald United States
Peng Du New Zealand
Bert Tuk relative to Gyu‐Jeong Noh South Korea Gyu‐Jeong Noh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Gyu‐Jeong Noh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bert Tuk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bert Tuk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert Tuk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert Tuk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bert Tuk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert Tuk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert Tuk. The network helps show where Bert Tuk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bert Tuk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bert Tuk Line = papers co-authored together Bert Tuk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000707
2 1992206
3 199674
4 199660
5 201757
6
Characterization of the pharmacodynamic interaction between parent drug and active metabolite in vivo: midazolam and alpha-OH-midazolam.
199952
7 199933
8 199629
9 199828
10 199326
11 199721
12 202420
13 201616
14 200213
15 201912
16 199711
17 19967
18 20175
19 20245
20 20164

About Bert Tuk

Bert Tuk is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (6 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (2 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (2 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (593 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (174 citations), Pharmacology (140 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (98 citations) and Computational Mathematics (5 citations). Bert Tuk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bob Kemp, Janine Oberyé, HILBERT A. C. KAMPHUISEN, Aeilko Having Zwinderman, Meindert Danhof, Alfred L van Steveninck, Douwe D. Breimer, Adam F. Cohen, Jaap W. Mandema and Virginie M.M. Herben. Their work appears in journals such as F1000Research, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact