Benoît Rapoport

422 citations
20 papers · 230 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Demography top 5%
    • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
    • Family Dynamics and Relationships

Papers in

Benoît Rapoport

20 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

Benoît Rapoport
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Gender Studies 105
  • Demography 77
  • Accounting 43
  • General Health Professions 73
  • Sociology and Political Science 122
Replace Inés Hardoy with:
Inés Hardoy Norway
Jayoung Yoon United States
Fernando A. Lozano United States
Ewa Cukrowska‐Torzewska Poland
Karin Martinson United States
Martin Kreidl Czechia
Ishwar Khatiwada United States
Amy Y.C. Liu Australia
David Stanton Australia
Joe LaBriola United States
Benoît Rapoport relative to Inés Hardoy Norway Inés Hardoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Inés Hardoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Rapoport

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Rapoport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Rapoport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Rapoport more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Rapoport

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Rapoport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Rapoport. The network helps show where Benoît Rapoport may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Rapoport, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Rapoport Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Rapoport links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200761
2 201041
3 201725
4 200514
5 200114
6 200513
7 202011
8 20227
9 20187
10 20147
11 20066
12 20195
13 20165
14 20144
15 20133
16 20162
17 20022
18 20121
19
Parental time and family structures.
20011
20 20041

About Benoît Rapoport

Benoît Rapoport is a scholar working on Demography, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Gender Studies and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retirement, Disability, and Employment (10 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (7 papers), Global Health Care Issues (5 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers), Social Policies and Family (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (2 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (105 citations), Demography (77 citations), Accounting (43 citations), General Health Professions (73 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (122 citations). Benoît Rapoport has collaborated with scholars based in France, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Céline Le Bourdais, Anne Solaz, Catherine Sofer, Carole Bonnet, Muriel Roger, Dominique Meurs, Thierry Magnac and Antoine Bommier. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Economics of the Household, Journal of Population Economics, European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie, Economics of Education Review and Journal of Pensions Economics and Finance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact