Catherine Sofer

596 citations
28 papers · 366 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Catherine Sofer

26 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Catherine Sofer
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Gender Studies 181
  • Economics and Econometrics 164
  • Demography 61
  • Accounting 59
  • Sociology and Political Science 165
Replace Deborah Reed with:
Deborah Reed United States
Isolde Woittiez Netherlands
Julian McCrae United Kingdom
Javier Ruiz‐Castillo Spain
Mariko Lin Chang United States
Janice Compton Canada
William M. Rodgers United States
Georgi Kocharkov Germany
Karina Doorley Ireland
Anders Klevmarken Sweden
Catherine Sofer relative to Deborah Reed United States Deborah Reed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Deborah Reed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Sofer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Sofer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Sofer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Sofer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Sofer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Sofer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Sofer. The network helps show where Catherine Sofer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Sofer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Sofer Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Sofer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201379
2 200254
3 199846
4 201045
5 199028
6 200917
7 200415
8 200914
9 201912
10 20028
11 20087
12 20066
13
Measuring Gender Norms in Domestic Work: A Comparison between Homosexual and Heterosexual Couples
20205
14 20155
15 20045
16 20194
17 19983
18
Access to the first job: a comparison between apprenticeship and vocational school in France
20022
19 19922
20 20092

About Catherine Sofer

Catherine Sofer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Demography, having authored 28 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (17 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (10 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (9 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers), Social Policies and Family (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers) and Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (181 citations), Economics and Econometrics (164 citations), Demography (61 citations), Accounting (59 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (165 citations). Catherine Sofer has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christophe Daniel, Almudena Sevilla, Susan Himmelweit, Liliane Bonnal, Benoît Rapoport, Anne Solaz, Nathalie Havet, Andrew E. Clark, Martine Gross and Olivia Ekert‐Jaffé. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Population Economics, Labour, Experimental Economics, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Journal of Labor Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact