Benoît Guillot

42 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Benoît Guillot
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 921
  • Inorganic Chemistry 325
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 301
  • Materials Chemistry 715
  • Organic Chemistry 385
Replace Parthapratim Munshi with:
Parthapratim Munshi India
P.M. Dominiak Poland
Elizabeth A. Zhurova United States
S. Domagała Poland
Maurizio Sironi Italy
R. Destro Italy
Irena Majerz Poland
Gustavo Portalone Italy
Sebastian Höfener Germany
Jens Spanget‐Larsen Denmark
Benoît Guillot relative to Parthapratim Munshi India Parthapratim Munshi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Parthapratim Munshi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Guillot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Guillot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Guillot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Guillot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Guillot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Guillot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Guillot. The network helps show where Benoît Guillot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Guillot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Guillot Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Guillot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005305
2 2007152
3 2012131
4 2016102
5 2003100
6 201668
7 200065
8 200455
9 200951
10 201449
11 201648
12 200947
13 201143
14 200942
15 201236
16 201236
17 200329
18 201328
19 201227
20 201926

About Benoît Guillot

Benoît Guillot is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallography and molecular interactions (26 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (15 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (6 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (5 papers), X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (4 papers) and Crystal structures of chemical compounds (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (921 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (325 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (301 citations), Materials Chemistry (715 citations) and Organic Chemistry (385 citations). Benoît Guillot has collaborated with scholars based in France, Poland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christian Jelsch, Claude Lecomte, M. Nespolo, V. Pichon-Pesme, Bertrand Fournier, Dorothée Liebschner, S. Domagała, Bartosz Zarychta, N. Muzet and Benjamin Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Crystal Growth & Design, Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact