M. Nespolo

117 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

M. Nespolo
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 944
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 191
  • Geophysics 392
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 201
  • Inorganic Chemistry 309
Replace Nikita V. Chukanov with:
Nikita V. Chukanov Russia
C. M. Gramaccioli Italy
Yves Nöel France
Luciano Ungaretti Italy
Α. Kirfel Germany
Pier Francesco Zanazzi Italy
Vittorio Tazzoli Italy
Vladimir V. Shilovskikh Russia
Angelika Sebald Germany
Maurice Leslie United Kingdom
M. Nespolo relative to Nikita V. Chukanov Russia Nikita V. Chukanov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nikita V. Chukanov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Nespolo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Nespolo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Nespolo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Nespolo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Nespolo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Nespolo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Nespolo. The network helps show where M. Nespolo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Nespolo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Nespolo Line = papers co-authored together M. Nespolo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 126 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016101
2 200192
3 199986
4 200059
5 201858
6 200450
7 200145
8 200543
9 200440
10 201638
11 202134
12 200034
13 202032
14 200332
15 199929
16 200629
17 199928
18 199928
19 199928
20 200628

About M. Nespolo

M. Nespolo is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Geophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 126 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystal Structures and Properties (43 papers), X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (43 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (23 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (15 papers), Mineralogy and Gemology Studies (13 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (13 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (10 papers) and Clay minerals and soil interactions (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (944 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (191 citations), Geophysics (392 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (201 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (309 citations). M. Nespolo has collaborated with scholars based in France, Japan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni Ferraris, B. Souvignier, Toshihiro Kogure, Benoît Guillot, M. I. Aroyo, Haruo Ohashi, H. Takeda, Rudolf Hoppe, S. Ďurovič and H. Grimmer. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Mineralogy, Journal of Applied Crystallography, Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials, Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances and Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science Crystal Engineering and Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact