Benoît Godey

88 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

Benoît Godey
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Sensory Systems 170
  • Otorhinolaryngology 156
  • Neurology 58
  • Rheumatology 48
Replace M. Ptok with:
M. Ptok Germany
Francesco Galletti Italy
Vedat Topsakal Belgium
Yasuhiro Osaki Japan
Ted A. Meyer United States
B. Meyer France
Daniel M. Zeitler United States
Gerald R. Popelka United States
Il Joon Moon South Korea
Heikki Löppönen Finland
Benoît Godey relative to M. Ptok Germany M. Ptok's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
M. Ptok · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Godey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Godey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Godey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Godey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Godey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Godey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Godey. The network helps show where Benoît Godey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Godey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Godey Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Godey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001305
2 2015260
3 2013172
4 201898
5 201676
6 200874
7 202151
8 200450
9 201750
10 199946
11 200044
12 200143
13 200542
14 201442
15 201637
16 201935
17 201333
18 201627
19 201524
20 200923

About Benoît Godey

Benoît Godey is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology, Sensory Systems, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Surgery, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (54 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (10 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (7 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (4 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (2 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Sensory Systems (170 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (156 citations), Neurology (58 citations) and Rheumatology (48 citations). Benoît Godey has collaborated with scholars based in France, Belgium and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Jozina B. De Graaf, Catherine Liégeois‐Chauvel, Denis Schwartz, Patrick Chauvel, Isabelle Mosnier, Olivier Sterkers, Michel Mondain, Mathieu Marx, P. Bordure and Xavier Morandi. Their work appears in journals such as European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Cochlear Implants International, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology and Acta Oto-Laryngologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact