B. Meyer

61 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

B. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Sensory Systems 290
  • Speech and Hearing 200
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 546
  • Otorhinolaryngology 85
  • Neurology 160
Replace Gerald R. Popelka with:
Gerald R. Popelka United States
Bruno Frachet France
Ruth Lang‐Roth Germany
R. Schönweiler Germany
Heikki Löppönen Finland
P. Osterhammel Denmark
Ellis Douek United Kingdom
Kazutomo Kitajima Japan
Kazuoki Kodera Japan
K. Terkildsen Denmark
B. Meyer relative to Gerald R. Popelka United States Gerald R. Popelka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gerald R. Popelka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Meyer. The network helps show where B. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside B. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together B. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010127
2 200280
3 200475
4 200960
5 201157
6 200354
7 198144
8 201441
9 201533
10 198331
11 198331
12 200129
13 199826
14 199225
15 201023
16 201022
17
Postoperative complications in otospongiosis: usefulness of MR imaging.
200121
18 197921
19 197920
20 198420

About B. Meyer

B. Meyer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Physiology, Speech and Hearing and Signal Processing, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (36 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (8 papers), Noise Effects and Management (7 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (6 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (290 citations), Speech and Hearing (200 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (546 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (85 citations) and Neurology (160 citations). B. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include C. H. Chouard, Christian Lorenzi, Dan Gnansia, Olivier Sterkers, K Marsot-Dupuch, Bernard Fleury, Boris Pételle, Dominique Rakotonanahary, Christian Füllgrabe and Diane S. Lazard. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Oto-Laryngologica, International Journal of Audiology, Audiology and Neurotology, Hearing Research and European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact