Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner

140 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Sensory Systems 987
  • Otorhinolaryngology 694
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.9k
  • Speech and Hearing 443
  • Signal Processing 325
Replace Wolfgang Gstœttner with:
Wolfgang Gstœttner Austria
Arne Ernst Germany
Oliver F. Adunka United States
Il Joon Moon South Korea
Göran Bredberg Sweden
Vittorio Colletti Italy
Michel Mondain France
Éric Truy France
Gerald R. Popelka United States
Anke Lesinski‐Schiedat Germany
Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner relative to Wolfgang Gstœttner Austria Wolfgang Gstœttner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Wolfgang Gstœttner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner. The network helps show where Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner Line = papers co-authored together Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 147 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004238
2 2004107
3 2010104
4 200792
5 200085
6 199783
7 201480
8 200676
9 200475
10 199671
11 201465
12 200262
13 200761
14 200260
15 200460
16 201059
17 200354
18 200852
19 200651
20 200149

About Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner

Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology, Sensory Systems, Signal Processing and Surgery, having authored 147 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (68 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (30 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (25 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (13 papers), Animal health and immunology (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (7 papers), Connexins and lens biology (4 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (987 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (694 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.9k citations), Speech and Hearing (443 citations) and Signal Processing (325 citations). Wolf‐Dieter Baumgartner has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Gstœttner, Jafar Hamzavi, Christoph Arnoldner, Dominik Riss, Bernhard Laback, Peter Franz, Stefan Marcel Pok, Jafar‐Sasan Hamzavi, Piotr Majdak and Jan Kiefer. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Otology & Neurotology, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology, The Laryngoscope and International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact