Benjamin Tag

1.6k citations
95 papers · 909 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Tag

84 papers receiving 883 citations

Peers

Benjamin Tag
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Human-Computer Interaction 303
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 202
  • Applied Psychology 60
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 233
  • Health Informatics 16
Replace Jörn Hurtienne with:
Jörn Hurtienne Germany
Alexander Skulmowski Germany
Andreas Duenser Australia
Samuel Mascarenhas Portugal
Michael A. Rupp United States
Mary Ellen Foster United Kingdom
Daniel Buschek Germany
Mohammad Obaid Sweden
Igor Dolgov United States
Carolin Wienrich Germany
Benjamin Tag relative to Jörn Hurtienne Germany Jörn Hurtienne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jörn Hurtienne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Tag

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Tag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Tag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Tag more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Tag

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Tag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Tag. The network helps show where Benjamin Tag may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Tag, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Tag Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Tag links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202162
2 202056
3 201951
4 202147
5 202241
6 202041
7 201835
8 202228
9 201925
10 201923
11 202223
12 201621
13 202320
14 202218
15 202317
16 202217
17 202217
18 202016
19 201716
20 202013

About Benjamin Tag

Benjamin Tag is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 95 papers that have together received 909 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (23 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (11 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (11 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (9 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (8 papers) and Personal Information Management and User Behavior (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (303 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (202 citations), Applied Psychology (60 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (233 citations) and Health Informatics (16 citations). Benjamin Tag has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tilman Dingler, Jorge Gonçalves, Kai Kunze, Greg Wadley, Vassilis Kostakos, Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, George Chernyshov, Niels van Berkel, Kangning Yang and Chaofan Wang. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Pervasive Computing, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact