Benjamin Tag

1.7k citations
102 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Tag

92 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Benjamin Tag
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Human-Computer Interaction 367
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 241
  • General Decision Sciences 22
  • Safety Research 76
  • Applied Psychology 30
Replace Danielle M. Lottridge with:
Danielle M. Lottridge New Zealand
Scotty D. Craig United States
Pedro Campos Portugal
Richard Pak United States
Jonathan Rowe United States
Andrew McGregor Olney United States
Patrik Pluchino Italy
Jonathan Klein United States
Dieter Wallach Germany
Robin Welsch Germany
Benjamin Tag relative to Danielle M. Lottridge New Zealand Danielle M. Lottridge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Danielle M. Lottridge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Tag

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Tag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Tag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Tag more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Tag

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Tag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Tag. The network helps show where Benjamin Tag may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Tag, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Tag Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Tag links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202198
2 202174
3 202062
4 201952
5 202149
6 202245
7 202040
8 201837
9 202231
10 201927
11 202225
12 201923
13 201622
14 202221
15 202321
16 202320
17 202219
18 202218
19 201717
20 202017

About Benjamin Tag

Benjamin Tag is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety Research, having authored 102 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotion and Mood Recognition (21 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (19 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (14 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (14 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (7 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (7 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (6 papers) and Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (367 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (241 citations), General Decision Sciences (22 citations), Safety Research (76 citations) and Applied Psychology (30 citations). Benjamin Tag has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tilman Dingler, Jorge Gonçalves, Kai S. Kunze, Greg Wadley, Vassilis Kostakos, Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Niels van Berkel, George Chernyshov, Chaofan Wang and Kangning Yang. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Pervasive Computing, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact