Benjamin Stillerman
Impact in
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- Cultural Differences and Values 2
- Action Observation and Synchronization 1
-
- Face Recognition and Perception 2
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 2
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 1
- Co-authors
- Clifford Nass (1 shared paper)Holden Bamford (1 shared paper)Steven Yang (1 shared paper)Michael Zhou (1 shared paper)Aman Kumar (1 shared paper)Roy Pea (1 shared paper)Gina R. Kuperberg (2 shared papers)Kirsten Weber (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Current Opinion in Psychology (1 paper)Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (1 paper)Developmental Psychology (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSweden
In The Last Decade
Benjamin Stillerman
6 papers receiving 341 citations
Benjamin Stillerman's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Communication 49
- Applied Psychology 27
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 65
- Information Systems and Management 34
- Sociology and Political Science 209
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Stillerman
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Stillerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Stillerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Stillerman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Stillerman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Stillerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Stillerman. The network helps show where Benjamin Stillerman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Stillerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 289 |
| 2 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 4 |
About Benjamin Stillerman
Benjamin Stillerman is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper), Media Influence and Health (1 paper) and Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (49 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (65 citations), Information Systems and Management (34 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (209 citations). Benjamin Stillerman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Clifford Nass, Holden Bamford, Steven Yang, Michael Zhou, Aman Kumar, Roy Pea, Gina R. Kuperberg, Kirsten Weber, Ellen Lau and Jonathan B. Freeman. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Current Opinion in Psychology, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Developmental Psychology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.