Benjamin Smith

20 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers

Benjamin Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 230
  • Family Practice 125
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 164
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 18
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
Replace Jelmer Alsma with:
Jelmer Alsma Netherlands
Chris Johnson United Kingdom
Heidi Eukel United States
David S. Sherman United States
James Bashford United Kingdom
Janet Reed United States
Ivan Bindoff Australia
Toyin Tofade United States
David Gerrett United Kingdom
Jayashri Sankaranarayanan United States
Benjamin Smith relative to Jelmer Alsma Netherlands Jelmer Alsma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Jelmer Alsma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Smith. The network helps show where Benjamin Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Smith Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008265
2 2011149
3 201046
4 201139
5 200433
6 200520
7 201617
8 201312
9 202111
10 201711
11 201110
12 20207
13 20176
14 20244
15 20224
16 20242
17 20102
18 20222
19 20251
20 20101

About Benjamin Smith

Benjamin Smith is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Error Correcting Code Techniques (2 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Software Engineering Research (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (2 papers) and Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (230 citations), Family Practice (125 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (164 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (18 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations). Benjamin Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Barry A. Bunting, Susan E. Sutherland, Paul Bebbington, Daniel Freeman, Philippa Garety, Ernst J. Kuipers, D. Fowler, G. Dunn, Joanne Hodgekins and Masoud Ardakani. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Journal of Transport & Health, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Radiotherapy and Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact