Benjamin Schmid
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 26
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 23
-
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases 8
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 4
- Co-authors
- Thomas Gasser (8 shared papers)Ina Kötter (4 shared papers)Lutz Heide (4 shared papers)Bjørn Holst (24 shared papers)Daniela Berg (4 shared papers)Troels T. Nielsen (16 shared papers)Kristine Freude (11 shared papers)Barbara C. Paton (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Benjamin Schmid
62 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Benjamin Schmid's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Aging 75
- Developmental Neuroscience 133
- Neurology 394
- Physiology 540
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 380
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Schmid
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Schmid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Schmid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Schmid. The network helps show where Benjamin Schmid may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | iPSC-derived neurons from GBA1-associated Parkinson’s disease patients show autophagic defects and impaired calcium homeostasis Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 421 |
| 2 | 2013 | 309 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 108 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 103 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 102 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 71 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 67 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 63 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 59 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 59 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 47 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 47 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 25 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 23 |
About Benjamin Schmid
Benjamin Schmid is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Neurology and Aging, having authored 64 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (26 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (23 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (8 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (6 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (75 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (133 citations), Neurology (394 citations), Physiology (540 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (380 citations). Benjamin Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Gasser, Ina Kötter, Lutz Heide, Bjørn Holst, Daniela Berg, Troels T. Nielsen, Kristine Freude, Barbara C. Paton, K. Harzer and David C. Schöndorf. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cell Research, PLoS ONE, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.