Benjamin S. Teeter

26 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Benjamin S. Teeter
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 71
  • Family Practice 25
  • Health 70
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 8
  • Epidemiology 95
Replace Autumn Stewart‐Lynch with:
Autumn Stewart‐Lynch United States
Kimberly C. McKeirnan United States
Shangbin Tang United States
Nasser Sharareh United States
Jay D. Currie United States
Eve Losman United States
Jennifer L. Rodis United States
Erika Zelko Slovenia
Laura Calligaris Italy
Elias Ali Yesuf Ethiopia
Benjamin S. Teeter relative to Autumn Stewart‐Lynch United States Autumn Stewart‐Lynch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Autumn Stewart‐Lynch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin S. Teeter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin S. Teeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin S. Teeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin S. Teeter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin S. Teeter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin S. Teeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin S. Teeter. The network helps show where Benjamin S. Teeter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin S. Teeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin S. Teeter Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin S. Teeter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201764
2 201841
3 201438
4 201433
5 202029
6 201727
7 201624
8 202021
9 202315
10 201814
11 202310
12 20199
13 20218
14 20198
15 20217
16 20236
17 20146
18 20185
19 20145
20
Evaluation of Student Outcomes After Participating in a Medicare Outreach Program
20154

About Benjamin S. Teeter

Benjamin S. Teeter is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and General Health Professions, having authored 28 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (71 citations), Family Practice (25 citations), Health (70 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (8 citations) and Epidemiology (95 citations). Benjamin S. Teeter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey M. Curran, Salisa C. Westrick, Jan Kavookjian, Bradley C. Martin, Sarah J. Shoemaker, J. N. Thomas, Holly Swan, Kimberly B. Garza, Mark J. Edlund and Katharine A. Bradley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Implementation Science and The Annals of Family Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact