Benjamin M. Ford

643 citations
29 papers · 486 · h-index 14

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 2%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
    • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Papers in

Benjamin M. Ford

29 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Benjamin M. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Toxicology 78
  • Pharmacology 180
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 119
  • Ecological Modeling 23
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 59
Replace Jamie K. Lau with:
Jamie K. Lau United States
Marcelo E. Lagos Chile
Ann Abraham United States
R. Bagnis French Polynesia
Yahia Mahmud Bangladesh
Kevin Heasman New Zealand
Silke Kauferstein Germany
Takuya Matsumoto Japan
Mike Capra Australia
Nanami Mizusawa Japan
Benjamin M. Ford relative to Jamie K. Lau United States Jamie K. Lau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Jamie K. Lau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin M. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin M. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin M. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin M. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin M. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin M. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin M. Ford. The network helps show where Benjamin M. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin M. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin M. Ford Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin M. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201771
2 201353
3 201335
4 201733
5 201826
6 201325
7 201624
8 201320
9 201920
10 202020
11 201818
12 201718
13 201617
14 201414
15 201813
16 201911
17 202210
18 201610
19 201410
20 201710

About Benjamin M. Ford

Benjamin M. Ford is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Molecular Biology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (5 papers), Marine and fisheries research (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (78 citations), Pharmacology (180 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (119 citations), Ecological Modeling (23 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (59 citations). Benjamin M. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Paul L. Prather, J. Dale Roberts, Lirit N. Franks, William E. Fantegrossi, Sherrica Tai, Peter Speldewinde, Peter A. Crooks, B. A. Stewart, J. Hobbs and Narsimha Reddy Penthala. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Biology, Annals of Vascular Surgery, Pharmacological Research, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact