Benjamin Laenen
Impact in
-
- Bryophyte Studies and Records
- Lichen and fungal ecology
- Plant and animal studies
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Bryophyte Studies and Records 20
- Lichen and fungal ecology 15
- Plant and animal studies 3
-
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 17
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 6
- Co-authors
- Alain Vanderpoorten (19 shared papers)Aurélie Désamoré (22 shared papers)Tanja Slotte (13 shared papers)Jairo Patiño (9 shared papers)Kim A. Steige (5 shared papers)Juana María González‐Mancebo (5 shared papers)Nicolas Devos (4 shared papers)Rubén G. Mateo (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Benjamin Laenen
37 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 678
- Ecological Modeling 115
- Plant Science 660
- Genetics 305
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 106
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Laenen
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Laenen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Laenen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Laenen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Laenen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Laenen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Laenen. The network helps show where Benjamin Laenen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Laenen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 56 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 55 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 25 |
About Benjamin Laenen
Benjamin Laenen is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cell Biology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bryophyte Studies and Records (20 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (17 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (15 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (8 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (5 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (678 citations), Ecological Modeling (115 citations), Plant Science (660 citations), Genetics (305 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (106 citations). Benjamin Laenen has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Belgium and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Alain Vanderpoorten, Aurélie Désamoré, Tanja Slotte, Jairo Patiño, Kim A. Steige, Juana María González‐Mancebo, Nicolas Devos, Rubén G. Mateo, S. Robbert Gradstein and A. Jonathan Shaw. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biogeography, New Phytologist, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Taxon and Molecular Biology and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.