Benjamin J. Bates

29 papers receiving 219 citations

Peers

Benjamin J. Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Communication 91
  • Media Technology 64
  • Marketing 43
  • Strategy and Management 54
  • Urban Studies 16
Replace David Osimo with:
David Osimo Spain
Tuen‐yu Lau United States
Jan van Cuilenburg Netherlands
Joe Karaganis United States
Christopher Ali United States
Merja Myllylahti New Zealand
Phil Weiser United States
Elisa Oreglia United States
Naci Karkın Türkiye
Maximilian Heimstädt Germany
Benjamin J. Bates relative to David Osimo Spain David Osimo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
David Osimo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin J. Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin J. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin J. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin J. Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin J. Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin J. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin J. Bates. The network helps show where Benjamin J. Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin J. Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin J. Bates Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin J. Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199334
2 199131
3 200924
4 199220
5 199218
6 201118
7 199316
8
INFORMATION AS AN ECONOMIC GOOD: A Re-Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches
200615
9 198815
10 199912
11
Research Publication Characteristics and their Relative Values: A Report for the Publishing Research Consortium
201011
12 19919
13 19839
14 19879
15 20118
16 19957
17 19926
18 19935
19 19915
20 20075

About Benjamin J. Bates

Benjamin J. Bates is a scholar working on Media Technology, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Communication, having authored 34 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ICT Impact and Policies (9 papers), Media Influence and Politics (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (5 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (5 papers), Transport and Economic Policies (3 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers) and Housing Market and Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (91 citations), Media Technology (64 citations), Marketing (43 citations), Strategy and Management (54 citations) and Urban Studies (16 citations). Benjamin J. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Baldwin, Todd Chambers, Minghua Xu, John C. Schweitzer, Ben Birch, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard, Donald W. King, Kenneth J. Levine and Karin Gwinn Wilkins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Annals of the International Communication Association, Journal of Media Economics, Telecommunications Policy and Futures.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact