Benjamin J. Bates

31 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Benjamin J. Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Communication 97
  • Media Technology 66
  • Marketing 46
  • Strategy and Management 59
  • Library and Information Sciences 5
Replace David Osimo with:
David Osimo Spain
Joe Karaganis United States
Tuen‐yu Lau United States
Bozena I. Mierzejewska United States
Jay L . Chatzkel United States
Jan van Cuilenburg Netherlands
Caroline Pauwels Belgium
Maximilian Heimstädt Germany
Paul Clemens Murschetz Austria
Gary Chapman United Kingdom
Benjamin J. Bates relative to David Osimo Spain David Osimo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
David Osimo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin J. Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin J. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin J. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin J. Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin J. Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin J. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin J. Bates. The network helps show where Benjamin J. Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin J. Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin J. Bates Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin J. Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199338
2 199131
3 200928
4 201121
5 199221
6
INFORMATION AS AN ECONOMIC GOOD: A Re-Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches
200621
7 199218
8 199318
9 198816
10
Research Publication Characteristics and their Relative Values: A Report for the Publishing Research Consortium
201012
11 199912
12 19839
13 19919
14 19879
15 20118
16 19927
17 19957
18 20076
19 19915
20 19905

About Benjamin J. Bates

Benjamin J. Bates is a scholar working on Media Technology, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Communication, having authored 36 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ICT Impact and Policies (10 papers), Media Influence and Politics (6 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (5 papers), Transport and Economic Policies (4 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers) and Digital Platforms and Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (97 citations), Media Technology (66 citations), Marketing (46 citations), Strategy and Management (59 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (5 citations). Benjamin J. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Todd Chambers, Thomas Baldwin, Minghua Xu, John C. Schweitzer, Donald W. King, Carol Tenopir, Ben Birch, Suzie Allard, Kenneth J. Levine and Karin Gwinn Wilkins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Annals of the International Communication Association, Journal of Media Economics, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology and Telecommunications Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact