Journal of Media Economics

450 papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 450 papers published in Journal of Media Economics in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Media Economics usually cover Sociology and Political Science (165 papers), Economics and Econometrics (154 papers) and Strategy and Management (139 papers) specifically the topics of Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (103 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (100 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Media Economics are Hsiang Iris Chyi, Robert G. Picard, Sylvia M. Chan‐Olmsted, John Dimmick, Barry R. Litman, Richard van der Wurff, Stephen Lacy, Michel Dupagne, Byeng-Hee Chang and Francis Lee.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Media Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Media Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Media Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Media Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Media Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Media Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Media Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025