Thomas Baldwin

2.7k citations
86 papers · 917 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Baldwin

74 papers receiving 754 citations

Peers

Thomas Baldwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • History and Philosophy of Science 111
  • Philosophy 268
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 270
  • Communication 137
  • General Psychology 11
Replace Joachim Schulte with:
Joachim Schulte Germany
Mark B. N. Hansen United States
Allan Janik Austria
Eric Livingston Australia
Jonathan Sterne Canada
Eric A. Havelock United States
Sanford Lakoff United States
John Burnheim Australia
Robert E. Innis United States
Newton Garver United States
Thomas Baldwin relative to Joachim Schulte Germany Joachim Schulte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Joachim Schulte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Baldwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Baldwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Baldwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Baldwin. The network helps show where Thomas Baldwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Baldwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Baldwin Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Baldwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
G.E. Moore: Selected Writings
199382
2 200474
3 199172
4 197657
5
Novel Neurotechnologies: Intervening in the Brain
201346
6
Convergence: Integrating Media, Information & Communication
199646
7 200642
8
On Considering a Possible World as Actual
200137
9 199137
10 201234
11 199632
12
G. E. Moore
199026
13 200324
14 199218
15 199118
16 200915
17 201313
18 197011
19 200910
20 199210

About Thomas Baldwin

Thomas Baldwin is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Communication, having authored 86 papers that have together received 917 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (10 papers), French Literature and Criticism (8 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (7 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (5 papers) and French Literature and Critical Theory (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (111 citations), Philosophy (268 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (270 citations), Communication (137 citations) and General Psychology (11 citations). Thomas Baldwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include G. E. Moore, Edward L. Keenan, David Atkin, Bradley S. Greenberg, Robert Stalnaker, Steven S. Wildman, Daniel E. Bergan, David Austin, Frederick Fico and Paul Zube. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, French Studies, Telecommunications Policy, EMBO Reports and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact