Benjamin D. Walcott

62 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Benjamin D. Walcott
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 330
  • Urology 92
  • Biophysics 84
  • Genetics 91
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 247
Replace Sarah Webb with:
Sarah Webb Hong Kong
Andrew Forge United Kingdom
Doreen E. Ashhurst United Kingdom
Peter O. Gerrits Netherlands
Birgit Hirschberg United States
Bill Chaudhry United Kingdom
David Bodian United States
Yoshikuni Tanioka Japan
George A. Edwards United States
Roger J. Keynes United Kingdom
Benjamin D. Walcott relative to Sarah Webb Hong Kong Sarah Webb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.4×
Sarah Webb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin D. Walcott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin D. Walcott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin D. Walcott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin D. Walcott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin D. Walcott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin D. Walcott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin D. Walcott. The network helps show where Benjamin D. Walcott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin D. Walcott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin D. Walcott Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin D. Walcott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004185
2 1976108
3 199794
4 198277
5 199863
6 200254
7 200354
8 197152
9 196944
10 198843
11 200542
12
Neuropeptides and the innervation of the avian lacrimal gland.
198940
13 196735
14 196532
15 198532
16 197030
17 198630
18 197129
19 197429
20 201329

About Benjamin D. Walcott

Benjamin D. Walcott is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Urology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (18 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (11 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (5 papers), Connexins and lens biology (5 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (330 citations), Urology (92 citations), Biophysics (84 citations), Genetics (91 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (247 citations). Benjamin D. Walcott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Peter R. Brink, Kent T. Keyser, Maynard M. Dewey, Rhea J. C. Levine, Virginijus Valiūnas, Leon C. Moore, Chuanqing Ding, P A Sibony, George Adrian Horridge and Joseph F. Margiotta. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, The Journal of Cell Biology, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact