Andrew Forge

10.6k citations
140 papers · 9.0k · h-index 47

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Forge

135 papers receiving 8.6k citations

Peers

Andrew Forge
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Sensory Systems 5.9k
  • Neurology 1.8k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 605
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 399
Replace Guy Peel Richardson with:
Guy Peel Richardson United Kingdom
Andrew J. Griffith United States
Karen B. Avraham Israel
Karen P. Steel United Kingdom
Yehoash Raphael United States
Walter Marcotti United Kingdom
Robert J. Morell United States
Jeffrey R. Holt United States
Joe C. Adams United States
Peter G. Gillespie United States
Andrew Forge relative to Guy Peel Richardson United Kingdom Guy Peel Richardson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Guy Peel Richardson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Forge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Forge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Forge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Forge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Forge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Forge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Forge. The network helps show where Andrew Forge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Forge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Forge Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Forge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000531
2 2005472
3 1993451
4 1993432
5 2001349
6 2017272
7 2006263
8 2006234
9 2003228
10
Psychophysical and physiological advances in hearing
1998217
11 2007212
12 1985205
13 1989189
14 2000171
15 1998165
16 1998161
17 2005151
18 2007144
19 2009144
20 1999135

About Andrew Forge

Andrew Forge is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 140 papers that have together received 9.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (92 papers), Connexins and lens biology (24 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (23 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (15 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (10 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (9 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (9 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (5.9k citations), Neurology (1.8k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (605 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (399 citations). Andrew Forge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Schacht, Graham Nevill, Ruth Taylor, Daniel J. Jagger, James V. Corwin, Lin Li, Stefano O. Casalotti, Lei Li, Su-Hua Sha and Marzena Warchoł. Their work appears in journals such as Hearing Research, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Neuroscience, Science and Journal of Neurocytology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact