Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi

112 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Health 1.1k
  • General Psychology 44
  • Demography 185
  • Social Psychology 322
  • Sociology and Political Science 748
Replace Jean Giles-Sims with:
Jean Giles-Sims United States
Bernard Spilka United States
Robert Coles United States
David M. Wulff United States
Lene Arnett Jensen United States
Vincent Crapanzano United States
Jean Bethke Elshtain United States
Philip Rieff United States
Sudhir Kakar United States
James W. Fowler United States
Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi relative to Jean Giles-Sims United States Jean Giles-Sims's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Jean Giles-Sims · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi. The network helps show where Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 127 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978322
2 1998284
3 1976181
4 1976145
5 1972131
6
The psychology of religious behavior, belief and experience
1997122
7 201082
8 198981
9 201473
10 198068
11 197960
12 197745
13 198845
14 200645
15 197444
16 201444
17 199142
18 197540
19 199837
20 197836

About Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi

Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi is a scholar working on Health, Demography, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 127 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (39 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (15 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (14 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (14 papers), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (11 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.1k citations), General Psychology (44 citations), Demography (185 citations), Social Psychology (322 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (748 citations). Benjamin Beit‐Hallahmi has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Argyle, Samuel A. Mueller, Douglas E. Trimble, Gary D. Bouma, Alexander Z. Guiora, Ian S. Lustick, Cecelia Yoder Dull, Albert I. Rabin, Robert Brannon and Thomas Scovel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Review of Religious Research, The Journal of Social Psychology, Comprehensive Psychiatry and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact