Bas de Jong

13 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Bas de Jong
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Biophysics 106
  • Analytical Chemistry 77
  • Applied Psychology 24
  • Cancer Research 32
  • Molecular Biology 109
Replace Zhangming Chen with:
Zhangming Chen China
Jenny Luz Espinoza Poves Peru
Diane E. Bovenkamp United States
Daniela Rodrigues Portugal
Vsevolod Shurkhay Russia
Tobias Graf Germany
Rachel Liang United States
Monica A. Giovanni United States
Danni Luo China
Aijun Liao China
Bas de Jong relative to Zhangming Chen China Zhangming Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26.5×
Zhangming Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bas de Jong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bas de Jong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bas de Jong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bas de Jong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bas de Jong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bas de Jong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bas de Jong. The network helps show where Bas de Jong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bas de Jong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bas de Jong Line = papers co-authored together Bas de Jong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2005109
2 201164
3 201441
4 201513
5 202310
6 202310
7 20237
8 20236
9 20234
10 20132
11
Services Associated to Digitalised Contents of Tissues in Biobanks Across Europe: A Proof of Concept – BIOPOOL
20132
12 20241
13 20131
14 20250

About Bas de Jong

Bas de Jong is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (6 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Human Resource and Talent Management (1 paper) and Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (106 citations), Analytical Chemistry (77 citations), Applied Psychology (24 citations), Cancer Research (32 citations) and Molecular Biology (109 citations). Bas de Jong has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Tom C. Bakker Schut, Luís F. Santos, Gerwin J. Puppels, Rolf Wolthuis, Johan M. Kros, Senada Koljenović, Peter J. Caspers, Peter Riegman, Marcel Kap and Frank Cornelissen. Their work appears in journals such as Biopreservation and Biobanking, Science Translational Medicine, The Learning Organization, Journal of Biomedical Optics and European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact