Aijun Liao

523 citations
27 papers · 369 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Aijun Liao

26 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Aijun Liao
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Cancer Research 84
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Molecular Biology 274
  • Applied Psychology 15
  • Biophysics 16
Replace Kate M. O’Neill with:
Kate M. O’Neill United States
Yubo Fan United States
Viktor Posse Sweden
Ruth Barshir Israel
Oleksii S. Rukhlenko Ireland
Frances Connor United Kingdom
Marcin Pilarczyk United States
Duncan McHale United Kingdom
Matteo Bersanelli Italy
Sree N. Sreenath United States
Aijun Liao relative to Kate M. O’Neill United States Kate M. O’Neill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Kate M. O’Neill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aijun Liao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aijun Liao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aijun Liao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aijun Liao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aijun Liao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aijun Liao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aijun Liao. The network helps show where Aijun Liao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Aijun Liao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aijun Liao Line = papers co-authored together Aijun Liao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011142
2 201848
3 201622
4 202220
5 201419
6 201418
7
The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib reverses P-glycoprotein-mediated leukemia multi-drug resistance through the NF-kappaB pathway.
201213
8 202010
9 201810
10
[Screening human gastric carcinoma-associated antigens by serologic proteome analysis].
20079
11 20258
12 20188
13 20247
14 20255
15 20255
16 20134
17 20253
18 20243
19 20083
20 20252

About Aijun Liao

Aijun Liao is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, Cancer Research, Applied Psychology and Education, having authored 27 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (4 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (4 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers) and Cancer-related gene regulation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (84 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations), Molecular Biology (274 citations), Applied Psychology (15 citations) and Biophysics (16 citations). Aijun Liao has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Assieh Saadatpour, Xin Liu, István Albert, Réka Albert, Thomas P. Loughran, Rui‐Sheng Wang, Weiwei Zhou, Meifeng Yang, Defeng Li and Yuqiang Nie. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Oncology Reports, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health and BMC Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact