Bart Engelen

40 papers receiving 727 citations

Peers

Bart Engelen
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • General Decision Sciences 92
  • Applied Psychology 55
  • Safety Research 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 132
  • Information Systems and Management 48
Replace Connor Huff with:
Connor Huff United States
Clemens Kroneberg Germany
David Hagmann United States
Roxana M. Gonzalez United States
Philipp Lergetporer Germany
Michele F. Margolis United States
Linda J. Demaine United States
Mark Bernard United Kingdom
Gianluca Grimalda Germany
Michael Sances United States
Bart Engelen relative to Connor Huff United States Connor Huff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Connor Huff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bart Engelen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bart Engelen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bart Engelen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bart Engelen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bart Engelen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bart Engelen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bart Engelen. The network helps show where Bart Engelen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Bart Engelen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bart Engelen Line = papers co-authored together Bart Engelen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020186
2 201869
3 201469
4 201659
5 200748
6 201946
7 201944
8 200637
9 200825
10 201925
11 201924
12 201823
13 200922
14 201320
15 201316
16 202214
17 202011
18 200711
19 201710
20
Compulsory voting and its effects on political participation, interest and efficacy
20075

About Bart Engelen

Bart Engelen is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics and Econometrics and Safety Research, having authored 45 papers that have together received 803 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (92 citations), Applied Psychology (55 citations), Safety Research (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (132 citations) and Information Systems and Management (48 citations). Bart Engelen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andreas T. Schmidt, Thomas Nys, Stijn Neuteleers, Alfred Archer, Niels van de Ven, Alan Thomas, Jeroen Luyten, Philippe Beutels, Marc Hooghe and Joanne M. Chung. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Politica, Economics and Philosophy, Rationality and Society, Theory & Psychology and Res Publica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact