BA Clevidence

1.4k citations
16 papers · 1.1k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

BA Clevidence

16 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

BA Clevidence
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 362
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 246
  • Biochemistry 93
  • Biochemistry 83
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 203
Replace Fernando Lopez‐Segura with:
Fernando Lopez‐Segura Spain
JT Judd United States
Delfin Rodriguez–Leyva Canada
Ursel Wahrburg Germany
Taous Lassel France
Chesney K. Richter United States
Susan M Jalbert United States
Brent D. Flickinger United States
R McArthur Australia
Sylvia Pomeroy Australia
BA Clevidence relative to Fernando Lopez‐Segura Spain Fernando Lopez‐Segura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fernando Lopez‐Segura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by BA Clevidence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of BA Clevidence's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by BA Clevidence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BA Clevidence more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by BA Clevidence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by BA Clevidence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by BA Clevidence. The network helps show where BA Clevidence may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside BA Clevidence, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with BA Clevidence Line = papers co-authored together BA Clevidence links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1994331
2 1996138
3 1997132
4 1994129
5 2003105
6 199477
7 200545
8 200440
9 199232
10 201022
11 198310
12 19955
13 20035
14 20033
15 20051
16
Changes in the fecal flora composition of human volunteers in a double-blind randomized black tea feeding study
20021

About BA Clevidence

BA Clevidence is a scholar working on Physiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Cell Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (2 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (2 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (2 papers) and Tea Polyphenols and Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (362 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (246 citations), Biochemistry (93 citations), Biochemistry (83 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (203 citations). BA Clevidence has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include JT Judd, Janet Wittes, José M. Ordovás, J T Judd, José López‐Miranda, P. Mata, Alice H. Lichtenstein, Ernst J. Schaefer, C. R. Brown and Ronald E. Wrolstad. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition Journal, American Journal of Potato Research and Journal of Lipid Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact