Laura G. E. Smith

69 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Laura G. E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Communication 313
  • Applied Psychology 135
  • Social Psychology 489
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 440
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.0k
Replace Fiona A. White with:
Fiona A. White Australia
Susan E. Morgan United States
Virginia Eatough United Kingdom
Franciska Krings Switzerland
Oksana F. Yakushko United States
Jianxin Zhang China
Jason Paul Rose United States
Alan Finlayson United Kingdom
Fabio Sani United Kingdom
Juanne Nancarrow Clarke Canada
Laura G. E. Smith relative to Fiona A. White Australia Fiona A. White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Fiona A. White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laura G. E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura G. E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura G. E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura G. E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura G. E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura G. E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura G. E. Smith. The network helps show where Laura G. E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laura G. E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laura G. E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Laura G. E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017248
2 2013141
3 2014135
4 201894
5 202086
6 201081
7 201575
8 202268
9 201566
10 201066
11 201064
12
A history of materials and practices for wound management
201262
13 201859
14 201358
15 201156
16 202256
17 201153
18 201951
19 201545
20 201845

About Laura G. E. Smith

Laura G. E. Smith is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (21 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (11 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (5 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers) and Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (313 citations), Applied Psychology (135 citations), Social Psychology (489 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (440 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.0k citations). Laura G. E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Emma F. Thomas, Ailsa Russell, Kate Cooper, Craig McGarty, Tom Postmes, Ana‐Maria Bliuc, Catherine E. Amiot, Joanne R. Smith, Victor J. Callan and Girish Lala. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Social Psychology, British Journal of Social Psychology, Political Psychology, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations and Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact