Michael Goddard

751 citations
18 papers · 628 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Goddard

17 papers receiving 555 citations

Peers

Michael Goddard
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Biophysics 165
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 128
  • Physiology 29
  • Chemical Health and Safety 4
  • Speech and Hearing 36
Replace Annemie Maes with:
Annemie Maes Belgium
P.P. Reddy India
H. Gregg Claycamp United States
Michelina Lauriola Italy
Moon‐Koo Chung South Korea
Anne S. Kienhuis Netherlands
Cameron D. A. Mackay United Kingdom
Wm. B. Deichmann United States
Karen L. Blackburn United States
A. R. Jones Australia
Michael Goddard relative to Annemie Maes Belgium Annemie Maes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.6×
Annemie Maes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Goddard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Goddard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Goddard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Goddard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Goddard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Goddard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Goddard. The network helps show where Michael Goddard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Goddard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Goddard Line = papers co-authored together Michael Goddard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1995202
2 1994140
3 199192
4 199275
5 199520
6 199317
7 200414
8 199013
9 198912
10 199911
11 199510
12 19927
13
Dose-response relationships in carcinogenesis.
19926
14 19954
15 19913
16 19901
17 19961
18 19970

About Michael Goddard

Michael Goddard is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Biophysics, Small Animals and Statistics and Probability, having authored 18 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (10 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (2 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (2 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (2 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (2 papers), Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (2 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (165 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (128 citations), Physiology (29 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (4 citations) and Speech and Hearing (36 citations). Michael Goddard has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Daniel R. Krewski, David W. Lecuyer, Jan M. Zielinski, M.A. Stuchly, N. W. Choi, Jinlin Du, Ernest G. Létourneau, Katherine A. Stitzel, Arthur P. Walker and I. Chu. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Information Journal, Cancer Letters, Risk Analysis, Chemosphere and Inhalation Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact