Anthony Preus

1.4k citations
50 papers · 750 · h-index 13

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 0.5%
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Classics top 5%
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

Anthony Preus

43 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Anthony Preus
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Philosophy 390
  • Classics 72
  • Anthropology 105
  • History and Philosophy of Science 76
  • History 75
Replace Michael Frede with:
Michael Frede United Kingdom
William W. Fortenbaugh United States
John Μ. Rist Canada
Friedrich Solmsen United States
Glenn W. Most Germany
David Sider United States
Charles H. Kahn United States
Brad Inwood Canada
Walter Kranz Brazil
Hans Aarsleff United States
Anthony Preus relative to Michael Frede United Kingdom Michael Frede's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Michael Frede · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Preus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Preus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Preus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Preus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony Preus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Preus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Preus. The network helps show where Anthony Preus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Anthony Preus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anthony Preus Line = papers co-authored together Anthony Preus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973113
2 198283
3 198080
4 197773
5 200369
6 197261
7 197844
8 198935
9 197025
10
On the movement and progression of animals
198117
11 197716
12 199316
13 199314
14 198313
15 199910
16 201510
17 19768
18 19878
19 19835
20
Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy Iii: Plato
19895

About Anthony Preus

Anthony Preus is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, General Arts and Humanities, Classics and Urology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 750 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (43 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (1 paper), Legal Rights and Human Rights (1 paper) and Ethics and bioethics in healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (390 citations), Classics (72 citations), Anthropology (105 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (76 citations) and History (75 citations). Anthony Preus has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charlotte Witt, Pierre Pellegrin, Aristotle  and John Peter Anton. Their work appears in journals such as International Studies in Philosophy, Journal of the History of Biology, Apeiron, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine and Ancient Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact