This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Apeiron. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Apeiron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Apeiron more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Apeiron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Apeiron.
About Apeiron
The 799 papers published in Apeiron in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Apeiron usually cover Philosophy (562 papers), Archeology (211 papers), Anthropology (193 papers), Theoretical Computer Science (11 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (43 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (538 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (199 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (182 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (96 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (32 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (30 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (26 papers) and Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Apeiron are Terry Penner, Robert J. Hankinson, Tim O’Keefe, Howard J. Curzer, Martha C. Nussbaum, Lesley Dean-Jones, Elizabeth Asmis, Paula Gottlieb, Miriam T Griffin and Jonathan Barnes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.