David Sider
Impact in
- Anthropology top 1%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Archeology top 0.5%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Papers in
- Anthropology 32
- Classical Antiquity Studies 31
- Archeology 30
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 24
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 4
- Co-authors
- Heinrich von Staden (1 shared paper)Oliver Taplin (1 shared paper)Deborah Boedeker (2 shared papers)C. C. W. Taylor (1 shared paper)Jan Ν. Bremmer (1 shared paper)Anne Carson (1 shared paper)Beth Savan (1 shared paper)David Bain (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Classical World (16 papers)The American Journal of Philology (10 papers)Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (2 papers)Arethusa (2 papers)Mnemosyne (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
David Sider
48 papers receiving 620 citations
David Sider's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Anthropology 558
- Archeology 392
- Philosophy 354
- Classics 72
- History 130
Countries citing papers authored by David Sider
This map shows the geographic impact of David Sider's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Sider with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Sider more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Sider
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Sider. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Sider. The network helps show where David Sider may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside David Sider, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria Hit paper breakdown → | 1990 | 285 |
| 2 | 1979 | 117 | |
| 3 | The new Simonides : contexts of praise and desire | 2001 | 83 |
| 4 | 2000 | 65 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 50 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 45 | |
| 7 | 1978 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 30 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1980 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 7 |
About David Sider
David Sider is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Philosophy, Classics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 63 papers that have together received 993 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (31 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (27 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (24 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (4 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers), History of Medicine Studies (3 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (558 citations), Archeology (392 citations), Philosophy (354 citations), Classics (72 citations) and History (130 citations). David Sider has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Heinrich von Staden, Oliver Taplin, Deborah Boedeker, C. C. W. Taylor, Jan Ν. Bremmer, Anne Carson, Beth Savan, David Bain, A.M.J. Derks and Karl Christ. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, The American Journal of Philology, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Arethusa and Mnemosyne.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.