Anne Stiles
Impact in
-
- Neurology and Historical Studies
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies
Papers in
-
- Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices 4
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 3
- History 7
- History of Medicine Studies 5
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 2
- Co-authors
- Stanley Finger (4 shared papers)John B. Bulevich (1 shared paper)Cho-Lea Tso (1 shared paper)John Naitoh (1 shared paper)Arie S. Belldegrun (1 shared paper)François Boller (2 shared papers)Robert A. Figlin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Progress in brain research (2 papers)Literature and medicine (2 papers)European Romantic Review (2 papers)Modern fiction studies (1 paper)Literature Compass (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Anne Stiles
16 papers receiving 94 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Neurology 25
- Literature and Literary Theory 34
- History 24
- Cultural Studies 16
- General Psychology 2
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Stiles
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Stiles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Stiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Stiles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Stiles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Stiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Stiles. The network helps show where Anne Stiles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Anne Stiles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 9 | Space and the "March of Mind": Literature and the Physical Sciences in Britain 1815-1850 | 2008 | 3 |
| 10 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 13 | Neurological and psychiatric disorders | 2013 | 2 |
| 14 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 16 | Progress in Brain Research Vol. 205: Literature, Neurology, and Neuroscience: Historical and Literary Connections | 2013 | 1 |
| 17 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 0 |
About Anne Stiles
Anne Stiles is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, History, Neurology, Philosophy and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 118 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurology and Historical Studies (6 papers), History of Medicine Studies (5 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers), Historical and Scientific Studies (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (3 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (25 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (34 citations), History (24 citations), Cultural Studies (16 citations) and General Psychology (2 citations). Anne Stiles has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Stanley Finger, John B. Bulevich, Cho-Lea Tso, John Naitoh, Arie S. Belldegrun, François Boller and Robert A. Figlin. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in brain research, Literature and medicine, European Romantic Review, Modern fiction studies and Literature Compass.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.