Malcolm Bowie

2.7k citations
21 papers · 120 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Malcolm Bowie

14 papers receiving 62 citations

Peers

Malcolm Bowie
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Literature and Literary Theory 62
  • General Psychology 4
  • Philosophy 29
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 12
  • Classics 7
Replace A. D. Nuttall with:
A. D. Nuttall United Kingdom
Athena Vrettos United States
Kenneth R. Johnston United States
Jill L. Matus Canada
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing Chile
John Felstiner United States
Terence Dolan
Heinrich F. Plett
David Ε. Wellbery United States
Morris Eaves United States
Malcolm Bowie relative to A. D. Nuttall United Kingdom A. D. Nuttall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
A. D. Nuttall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Bowie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Bowie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Bowie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Bowie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Bowie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Bowie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Bowie. The network helps show where Malcolm Bowie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Bowie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Bowie Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Bowie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198933
2
Proust Among the Stars
199818
3 198018
4
Psychoanalysis and the future of theory
199317
5 199014
6 20015
7 20033
8 19833
9 19792
10
The miracle of miracles
20021
11 19881
12 19741
13 20001
14 19761
15 19981
16 19831
17
Towards a poetics of Mallarme's late prose
19980
18
Proust entre las estrellas
20000
19 19980
20 19830

About Malcolm Bowie

Malcolm Bowie is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, Classics, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 120 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Literature and Critical Theory (11 papers), French Literature and Criticism (6 papers), French Literature and Poetry (5 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (3 papers), Literary Analysis and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (2 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (62 citations), General Psychology (4 citations), Philosophy (29 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (12 citations) and Classics (7 citations). Frequent co-authors include Calvin S. Brown, Sarah Kay, Terence Cave, David Bellos, B. McH., Dalia Judovitz, Edward Hughes and Mary Ann Caws. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Oxford Literary Review, SubStance, Poetics Today and Paragraph.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact