Malcolm Bowie
Impact in
-
- French Literature and Criticism
- French Literature and Critical Theory
- French Literature and Poetry
- Modernist Literature and Criticism
- Literature and Culture Studies
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
-
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
Papers in
-
- French Literature and Critical Theory 11
- French Literature and Criticism 8
- French Literature and Poetry 5
- Historical and Literary Analyses 3
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 6
- Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research 3
- Psychology and Mental Health 2
Malcolm Bowie
25 papers receiving 194 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Literature and Literary Theory 124
- Classics 24
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 23
- General Psychology 6
- Philosophy 43
Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Bowie
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Bowie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Bowie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Bowie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Bowie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Bowie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Bowie. The network helps show where Malcolm Bowie may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Bowie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 37 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 6 | Proust Among the Stars | 1998 | 21 |
| 7 | Psychoanalysis and the future of theory | 1993 | 20 |
| 8 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 18 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 19 | The miracle of miracles | 2002 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 1 |
About Malcolm Bowie
Malcolm Bowie is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Clinical Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Classics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Literature and Critical Theory (11 papers), French Literature and Criticism (8 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), French Literature and Poetry (5 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (3 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (3 papers), Literary Analysis and Cultural Studies (3 papers) and Psychology and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (124 citations), Classics (24 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (23 citations), General Psychology (6 citations) and Philosophy (43 citations). Frequent co-authors include Alan Sheridan, Jacques Lacan, Sarah Kay, Terence Cave, Calvin S. Brown, David Bellos, B. McH., Edward Hughes, Dalia Judovitz and Mary Ann Caws. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Paragraph, Oxford Literary Review, Comparative Literature and French Cultural Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.