Modern fiction studies

1.2k papers and 4.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Modern fiction studies in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Modern fiction studies usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (746 papers), Sociology and Political Science (319 papers) and Cultural Studies (194 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (187 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (126 papers) and American and British Literature Analysis (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern fiction studies are Barbara Page, John Beverley, Gillian Whitlock, Valerie Rohy, Graham Huggan, Rob Nixon, Hillary Chute, Jonathan Scott, John A. McClure and Marianne DeKoven.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Modern fiction studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern fiction studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern fiction studies.

Countries where authors publish in Modern fiction studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern fiction studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern fiction studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern fiction studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025